• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
et al., U. (2025). Pollution Status and Potential Ecological Risk of Toxic Metals in Sediments of the Lower Calabar and Great Kwa Rivers, Nigeria. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(2), 779-797. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.417642
Udiba et al.. "Pollution Status and Potential Ecological Risk of Toxic Metals in Sediments of the Lower Calabar and Great Kwa Rivers, Nigeria". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29, 2, 2025, 779-797. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.417642
et al., U. (2025). 'Pollution Status and Potential Ecological Risk of Toxic Metals in Sediments of the Lower Calabar and Great Kwa Rivers, Nigeria', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(2), pp. 779-797. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.417642
et al., U. Pollution Status and Potential Ecological Risk of Toxic Metals in Sediments of the Lower Calabar and Great Kwa Rivers, Nigeria. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2025; 29(2): 779-797. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.417642

Pollution Status and Potential Ecological Risk of Toxic Metals in Sediments of the Lower Calabar and Great Kwa Rivers, Nigeria

Article 48, Volume 29, Issue 2, March and April 2025, Page 779-797  XML PDF (493.85 K)
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.417642
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Udiba et al.
Abstract
Contaminants present in sediments serve as vital indicators of environmental health in aquatic ecosystems. This study aimed to investigate the current heavy metals pollution status and potential biological effects of the surface sediments of Great Kwa and Calabar Rivers, Nigeria, from October 2021 to August 2022. The concentrations of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As) were determined. The total metals concentrations in the sediment of both eivers ranged between: 4.457-11.341mg/ kg, 0.311-0.978mg/ kg, 0.034-0.096mg/ kg, and 0.134-0.755mg/ kg for lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic, respectively. Metal concentrations in the sediment of Calabar River were significantly (P≤ 0.05) higher than the Great Kwa River, except for arsenic. Both rivers did not exhibit significant seasonal variations in metal concentrations. Assessment of metals using United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the Australian and New Zealand sediment quality guidelines indicated that neither river was polluted with respect to the metals under study. The contamination factor for the metals corresponded to a low contamination level, except for lead, which showed a moderate contamination factor during the dry season. The average contamination degree for each river corresponded to low contamination degree. The pollution load index (PLI) also supported the conclusion that both rivers were not polluted. However, the concentration of cadmium at Esuk Nsidung exceeded the Threshold Effect Level (TEL), indicating potential risks to organisms in this specific location. The ecological risk factor analysis revealed that Pb, Cd, Hg, and As posed a low potential ecological risk to other components of the environment. This study emphasizes the importance of periodic monitoring of water and sediment quality in the Great Kwa and Calabar Rivers to ensure sustainable management and to safeguard human and environmental health.
Keywords
Heavy metals; Pollution status; Ecological risk; Sediment; Calabar River; Great Kwa River
Statistics
Article View: 87
PDF Download: 109
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.