• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
et al., L. (2024). Assessing Feeding Regimes and Its Impact on Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Performance and Aquaculturist Perceptions in Aquaculture. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 28(6), 775-789. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2024.393891
Laz-Figueroa et al.. "Assessing Feeding Regimes and Its Impact on Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Performance and Aquaculturist Perceptions in Aquaculture". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 28, 6, 2024, 775-789. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2024.393891
et al., L. (2024). 'Assessing Feeding Regimes and Its Impact on Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Performance and Aquaculturist Perceptions in Aquaculture', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 28(6), pp. 775-789. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2024.393891
et al., L. Assessing Feeding Regimes and Its Impact on Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Performance and Aquaculturist Perceptions in Aquaculture. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2024; 28(6): 775-789. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2024.393891

Assessing Feeding Regimes and Its Impact on Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) Performance and Aquaculturist Perceptions in Aquaculture

Article 43, Volume 28, Issue 6, November 2024, Page 775-789  XML PDF (242.11 K)
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2024.393891
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Laz-Figueroa et al.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of four different feeding regimes on the growth, health, economic effiency and perception of aquaculturists regarding Oreochromis sp. in the Guayas Province, Ecuador. Four treatments based on different feeding regimes were established: T1, once a day with a daily interval; T2, once a day with an interval every two days; T3, twice a day with a daily interval; and T4, twice a day with an interval every two days. Growth parameters such as total fish weight gain, average daily weight gain, daily feed intake, expected weight gain for each daily feed intake, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency, and protein productive value were measured. Health parameters included serum total protein content, albumin, serum globulins, cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose levels. Economic efficiency parameters such as feed cost and feed cost per kilogram of weight gain were also assessed. Additionally, surveys were conducted with aquaculturists to assess the perception of aquaculture farmers regarding the importance of growth factors, fish health, and economic efficiency in the selection of feeding regimes for Oreochromis sp < /em>. The results indicated that treatment T3 was the most effective in maximizing growth; treatment T1 excelled in fish health; and treatment T2 was the most economically efficient. In conclusion, the choice of feeding regime will depend on the farmers' priorities, with a general trend, according to the survey, toward economic efficiency and growth, while fish health, although relevant, is a secondary priority.
Keywords
Feeding regimes; Growth; Heath; Perception; Aquaculturists
Statistics
Article View: 177
PDF Download: 211
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.