• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
Ashry et al., O. (2023). Influence of different fermented fruit wastes phytobiotic as feed additive on zootechnical performance, bacteriological analysis, digestive enzymes, and immune response of Litopenaeus vannamei. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 27(4), 193-212. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2023.309142
Ola A. Ashry et al.. "Influence of different fermented fruit wastes phytobiotic as feed additive on zootechnical performance, bacteriological analysis, digestive enzymes, and immune response of Litopenaeus vannamei". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 27, 4, 2023, 193-212. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2023.309142
Ashry et al., O. (2023). 'Influence of different fermented fruit wastes phytobiotic as feed additive on zootechnical performance, bacteriological analysis, digestive enzymes, and immune response of Litopenaeus vannamei', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 27(4), pp. 193-212. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2023.309142
Ashry et al., O. Influence of different fermented fruit wastes phytobiotic as feed additive on zootechnical performance, bacteriological analysis, digestive enzymes, and immune response of Litopenaeus vannamei. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2023; 27(4): 193-212. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2023.309142

Influence of different fermented fruit wastes phytobiotic as feed additive on zootechnical performance, bacteriological analysis, digestive enzymes, and immune response of Litopenaeus vannamei

Article 13, Volume 27, Issue 4, July and August 2023, Page 193-212  XML PDF (867.86 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2023.309142
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Ola A. Ashry et al.
Abstract
A 45-day feeding trial using solid-state fermented orange peel (FOP) and prickly pear peel (FPP) by Brewer’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was conducted to evaluate water quality, microbiological analysis, digestive enzyme activities, gene expression, growth performance and survival of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei as phytobiotic products feed additives. Three treatments were formulated: Control (C, only commercial diet); FOP (2.5% FOP + commercial diet) and FPP (2.5% FPP + commercial diet). 720 post-larvae shrimp (0.05± 0.09g) were divided in three experimental treatments, with three replicate tanks each and stocked with 80 PL. It was observed that weight gain, feed conversion ratio, specific growth rate and survival %  differed significantly (P<0.05) between the FPP and the control. The total vibrio population in water and shrimp intestines declined significantly (P<0.05) in FOP and FPP; whilst, the heterotrophic was significantly enhanced (P<0.05) in FOP and FPP, compared to control. All digestive enzyme activities were influenced by an increase in the hepatopancreas, stomach and intestine of shrimp fed with FOP and FPP diets. Furthermore, both growth and immune-related gene expressions increased in FPP. The present study showed that the addition of 2.5% solid-state fermented orange or prickly pear peels by Brewer’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the shrimp diet can enhance shrimp development, intestinal bacteria, digestive enzymes and the gene expression of shrimp L. vannamei.
Keywords
Phytobiotic; Fermented fruit wastes; Feed additives; Digestive enzymes; Gene expression; Litopenaeus vannamei
Statistics
Article View: 310
PDF Download: 684
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.