• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
Shaha et al., D. (2022). Effects of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) on Organic Carp Fish Production. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 26(4), 705-725. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.254233
Dinesh Chandra Shaha et al.. "Effects of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) on Organic Carp Fish Production". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 26, 4, 2022, 705-725. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.254233
Shaha et al., D. (2022). 'Effects of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) on Organic Carp Fish Production', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 26(4), pp. 705-725. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.254233
Shaha et al., D. Effects of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) on Organic Carp Fish Production. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2022; 26(4): 705-725. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.254233

Effects of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) on Organic Carp Fish Production

Article 42, Volume 26, Issue 4, July and August 2022, Page 705-725  XML PDF (867.66 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.254233
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Dinesh Chandra Shaha et al.
Abstract
Inorganic aquaculture system, Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) provides the use of a holistic farming system based on partnership with nature. Therefore, in this study, we assessed the water quality parameter, growth performance parameter, and production of carp fishes in a polyculture system feeding Napier grass, and analyzed the benefit-cost ratio of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) and other carp fishes production using Napier grass under different stocking density with three treatments (T1, T2, T3) each with three replications following a randomized complete block design from July 2018 to June 2019. Stocking density was 1250 fish ha-1 (T1), 2500 fish ha-1 (T2), and 3750 fish ha-1 (T3) for grass carp. Catla (Catla catla), common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) were stocked along with grass carp at the rate of 1250 fish ha-1 for all treatments. Water quality parameters such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, and ammonia were within the suitable range for culture. No significant differences (p < /em>>0.05) were found among the treatments. The gross production was significantly higher in T3 (6.1-ton ha-1 year-1) followed by T2 (3.9-ton ha-1 year-1) and T1 (1.9-ton ha-1 year-1). The cost-benefit analysis revealed that the net income significantly varied (p < /em><0.05) among three treatments (659.0, 2569.8, and 5031.5 USD ha-1 year-1 in T1, T2 and T3, respectively).  From the economic point of view, better production and income of grass carp, catla, common carp, and mirror carp were estimated in T3 as the stocking density of grass carp was higher in T3 resulting in higher feces production caused higher plankton production in T3 ponds. The results imply that Napier grass can be used as a food source to replace commercial fish feed in the regular diet of grass carp without compromising the growth of fish and the potential for safe use in aquaculture.
Keywords
Organic aquaculture; Napier grass; Polyculture; Stocking density; Water quality
Statistics
Article View: 449
PDF Download: 802
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.