Home Articles List Article Information
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
Aminisarteshnizi, M. (2022). Comparison between two different DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from Astacus leptodactylus. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 26(2), 489-494. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.231706
Mehrnoush Aminisarteshnizi. "Comparison between two different DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from Astacus leptodactylus". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 26, 2, 2022, 489-494. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.231706
Aminisarteshnizi, M. (2022). 'Comparison between two different DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from Astacus leptodactylus', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 26(2), pp. 489-494. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.231706
Aminisarteshnizi, M. Comparison between two different DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from Astacus leptodactylus. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2022; 26(2): 489-494. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.231706

Comparison between two different DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from Astacus leptodactylus

Article 32, Volume 26, Issue 2, March and April 2022, Page 489-494  XML PDF (403.04 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2022.231706
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Mehrnoush Aminisarteshnizi
Abstract
Most aquatic studies are performed at the molecular level, which needs reliable, quick DNA extraction protocols. Extraction of genomic DNA with high quality is one of the basic needs of molecular genetics. This investigation indicated two different methods for obtaining a sufficient quality of genomic DNA of crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus). The DNA from A. leptodactylus was extracted using extraction methods Quick-DNA™ Tissue/Insect Miniprep Kit and Chelex method. We used eight samples of A. leptodactylus from the Anzali lagoon for this comparison. Total DNA was isolated from the abdominal tissues of all samples. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were measured using a spectrophotometer. The results showed that the highest quality of extracted DNA was in the Kit (1.82-1.9). The Chelex method showed the existence of proteins in the samples (1.48-1.73). In both methods, DNA was isolated, but the Kit method was more trustable and applicable for having good quality DNA. 
Keywords
DNA extraction; Astacus leptodactylus; spectrophotometer; Anzali lagoon
Statistics
Article View: 378
PDF Download: 665