• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
et al., D. (2025). Assessment of the Efficiency of Filtration Stations on the Quality of Euphrates River Water in Ramadi City. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(3), 2487-2500. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.433583
Dawd et al.. "Assessment of the Efficiency of Filtration Stations on the Quality of Euphrates River Water in Ramadi City". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29, 3, 2025, 2487-2500. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.433583
et al., D. (2025). 'Assessment of the Efficiency of Filtration Stations on the Quality of Euphrates River Water in Ramadi City', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(3), pp. 2487-2500. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.433583
et al., D. Assessment of the Efficiency of Filtration Stations on the Quality of Euphrates River Water in Ramadi City. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2025; 29(3): 2487-2500. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.433583

Assessment of the Efficiency of Filtration Stations on the Quality of Euphrates River Water in Ramadi City

Article 140, Volume 29, Issue 3, May and June 2025, Page 2487-2500  XML PDF (392.63 K)
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.433583
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Dawd et al.
Abstract
Surface water bodies are vital sources of water for human consumption, domestic use, agriculture, industrial activities, and the sustenance of aquatic life and ecosystems. This study aimed to evaluate the microbiological, physical, and chemical quality of the Euphrates River water in Ramadi City. Water samples were collected from seven different sites along the Euphrates River between November 2022 and March 2023. Both physicochemical parameters and biological tests were conducted. The recorded ranges for selected physicochemical parameters were as follows: pH (3.3–12.5), temperature (16.4–19.73°C), turbidity (0.62–29.1 NTU), and electrical conductivity (539.6–3871.3 µS/cm). Some of these values exceeded the limits recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Concentrations of various chemical constituents were within permissible WHO limits: calcium (Ca²⁺) ranged from 0.066 to 0.094 mg/L, magnesium (Mg²⁺) from 0.028 to 0.418mg/ L, sodium (Na⁺) from 32.87 to 97.00mg/ L, potassium (K⁺) from 1.903 to 3.867mg/ L, chloride (Cl⁻) from 0.061 to 0.091mg/ L, sulfate (SO₄²⁻) from 122.40 to 200.33mg/ L, and alum from 0.1063 to 0.2707mg/ L. Microbiological analysis revealed the presence of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria, including rods and Bacillus species, were isolated from Site 1 (S1), while Staphylococcus epidermidis (cocci) was identified at Site 9 (S9). In contrast, various Gram-negative bacteria—such as Klebsiella, E. coli, Pseudomonas, coccobacilli, and sticky colony-forming Bacilli—were isolated from Sites 2 through 8, in varying proportions. The findings indicate that the river water in the study area is moderately polluted and poses notable public health risks due to the presence of fecal contamination and emerging pathogenic bacteria.
Keywords
Water quality; Filtration stations; Water pollution; Euphrates River
Statistics
Article View: 62
PDF Download: 89
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.