• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
et al., K. (2025). Bioremediation vs. Traditional Methods: A Comparative Review of Heavy Metal Removal Techniques from Aquatic Environment. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(2), 1307-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.419832
Khalifa et al.. "Bioremediation vs. Traditional Methods: A Comparative Review of Heavy Metal Removal Techniques from Aquatic Environment". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29, 2, 2025, 1307-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.419832
et al., K. (2025). 'Bioremediation vs. Traditional Methods: A Comparative Review of Heavy Metal Removal Techniques from Aquatic Environment', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(2), pp. 1307-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.419832
et al., K. Bioremediation vs. Traditional Methods: A Comparative Review of Heavy Metal Removal Techniques from Aquatic Environment. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2025; 29(2): 1307-1335. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.419832

Bioremediation vs. Traditional Methods: A Comparative Review of Heavy Metal Removal Techniques from Aquatic Environment

Article 94, Volume 29, Issue 2, March and April 2025, Page 1307-1335  XML PDF (1023.86 K)
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.419832
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Khalifa et al.
Abstract
Heavy metals, while naturally occuring, become toxic when concentrated in water. There has been a significant increase in industrial waste entering the environment which affects the soil and water. This is largely due to industrial expansion, resulting in the accumulation of heavy metals. The elimination of heavy metals from wastewater has presented a considerable challenge for a prolonged duration. An assortment of methods have been developed for the removal of toxic metal ions from wastewater, including chemical precipitation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, reverse osmosis, and electrodialysis. Nonetheless, these traditional technologies incur significant costs attributed to the utilization of non-regenerable materials, elevated expenses, and the production of hazardous sludge. Bioremediation is a biotechnological process that effectively and economically removes heavy metals from aqueous solutions. This illustrates a conventional approach to employing economical alternative biological materials for the specified objective. Bioremediation is a critical component of environmental and bioresource technology, with increasing attention on the use of microorganisms specifically bacteria, algae, yeasts, and fungi as biosorbents for the removal of heavy metals. This review outlines the contributions of microorganisms and plants in the biotransformation of heavy metals into non-toxic forms, highlighting the superiority of green technologies over traditional methods for heavy metal remediation. This review juxtaposes the efficiency of bioremediation and traditional methods for the removal of heavy metals. It also presents the role of remote sensing and spatial analyses in enhancing bioremediation strategies by enabling precise detection, monitoring, and assessment of contaminated sites.
Keywords
Bioremediation; Phytoremediation; Bacteria; Remote sensing; Spatial analyses; Heavy metal
Statistics
Article View: 134
PDF Download: 88
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.