• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
et al., E. (2025). Feasibility of Sand Lobsters Rearing in Floating Net Cages with Different Depths, Number of Shelters, and Stocking Densities. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(1), 583-611. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.405950
Effendi et al.. "Feasibility of Sand Lobsters Rearing in Floating Net Cages with Different Depths, Number of Shelters, and Stocking Densities". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29, 1, 2025, 583-611. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.405950
et al., E. (2025). 'Feasibility of Sand Lobsters Rearing in Floating Net Cages with Different Depths, Number of Shelters, and Stocking Densities', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(1), pp. 583-611. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.405950
et al., E. Feasibility of Sand Lobsters Rearing in Floating Net Cages with Different Depths, Number of Shelters, and Stocking Densities. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2025; 29(1): 583-611. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.405950

Feasibility of Sand Lobsters Rearing in Floating Net Cages with Different Depths, Number of Shelters, and Stocking Densities

Article 33, Volume 29, Issue 1, January and February 2025, Page 583-611  XML PDF (882.19 K)
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2025.405950
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Effendi et al.
Abstract
Lobster cultivation can enhance productivity by adjusting the environment to match its natural habitat, such as depth, shelter to protect against cannibalism, and stocking density. This study aimed to analyze the production performance and feasibility of sand lobsters reared in floating net cages at varying depths, shelter numbers, and stocking densities. The research was conducted on Kelapa Dua Island, Seribu Islands, DKI Jakarta, and included three experiments using a completely randomized design (CRD) with three treatments and three replications for each treatment. The first experiment evaluated depths of 1, 2, and 3m. The second experiment tested shelter configurations with no shelters (0:8), a shelter-to-lobster ratio of 1:2 (4 shelter units/m²), and a ratio of 1:1 (8 shelter units/m²). The third experiment focused on stocking densities of 8, 12, and 16 lobsters/m². The results showed that depth significantly influences the production performance of sand lobster cultivation. A depth of 2 meters produced the best survival rates and commercial benefits, making it the most effective depth for floating net cage lobster farming. However, all depth treatments were financially unfeasible. The highest survival rate of 100% was achieved when using polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe shelters at a density of 4 units/m² (shelter-to-lobster ratio of 1:2). Although shelters improved survival rates, they did not significantly affect the lobster's weight gain rate, length gain rate, or feed conversion ratio. Nonetheless, shelters provided greater commercial benefits compared to other treatments, making them an attractive option for investment. Increasing stocking density to 16 lobsters/m² remained economically feasible despite a 20% decline in production, highlighting its potential to enhance investment sustainability.
Keywords
Business feasibility; Depth; Floating net cage; Number of shelters; Sand lobster; Stocking densities
Statistics
Article View: 221
PDF Download: 292
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.