• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 29 (2025)
Volume Volume 28 (2024)
Volume Volume 27 (2023)
Volume Volume 26 (2022)
Volume Volume 25 (2021)
Volume Volume 24 (2020)
Volume Volume 23 (2019)
Volume Volume 22 (2018)
Volume Volume 21 (2017)
Volume Volume 20 (2016)
Volume Volume 19 (2015)
Volume Volume 18 (2014)
Volume Volume 17 (2013)
Volume Volume 16 (2012)
Volume Volume 15 (2011)
Volume Volume 14 (2010)
Volume Volume 13 (2009)
Volume Volume 12 (2008)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 11 (2007)
Volume Volume 10 (2006)
Volume Volume 9 (2005)
Volume Volume 8 (2004)
Volume Volume 7 (2003)
Volume Volume 6 (2002)
Volume Volume 5 (2001)
Volume Volume 4 (2000)
Volume Volume 3 (1999)
Volume Volume 2 (1998)
Volume Volume 1 (1997)
(2008). Comparative study of trophic guilds of free living nematodes inhabiting Rosetta Estuary and Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 12(1), 117-142. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2008.1978
. "Comparative study of trophic guilds of free living nematodes inhabiting Rosetta Estuary and Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt". Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 12, 1, 2008, 117-142. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2008.1978
(2008). 'Comparative study of trophic guilds of free living nematodes inhabiting Rosetta Estuary and Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt', Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 12(1), pp. 117-142. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2008.1978
Comparative study of trophic guilds of free living nematodes inhabiting Rosetta Estuary and Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 2008; 12(1): 117-142. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2008.1978

Comparative study of trophic guilds of free living nematodes inhabiting Rosetta Estuary and Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt

Article 9, Volume 12, Issue 1, January 2008, Page 117-142  XML PDF (4.23 MB)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejabf.2008.1978
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Abstract
Trophic composition of free living nematodes within different stations at Rosetta estuary (RE) and Eastern Harbor of Alexandria (EH) was examined. Sediments at the highly dynamic RE were subjected to intense wave action and supported significantly (P<0.05) lower mean nematode density (<5 individuals per 10cm") than sediments within the EH. Mean nematode densities and numerical trophic abundance were highest at the semi- closed basin (p<0.05) that sheltered from liydrodynamic induced disturbance. The higher nematode abundance at EH was due to availability of food sources and heterogeneous sediment, whereas the lower nematode abundance at RE was due to homogenous sand and highly dynamical process. According to Jensen's classification (1987) trophic levels were composed of four guilds at both locations (deposit feeders, epistrate feeders, scavengers and predators). Deposit feeders dominated at the two locations (46.5% and 37% respectively at RE and EH) probably due to prevalence of fine and very fine sands and the high load of organic matter. Sediment characteristics and high load of organic matter appeared to be the limiting factors controlling the relative importance of nematode trophic guilds at RE and EH. The Univariate (ANOVA) and multivariate (PERMANOVA) analyses indicated that total nematode abundance and its trophic guilds were distinct between locations and among dates. No significant variation among or within stations except for scavengers. The extent to which the macro-sc.:le (Km) variability was more important than micro-scale (m) variability was tested and revealed the higher variability on larger scale than on smaller scale due to physical, hydrodynamic process as well as sediments characteristics.
Keywords
Meiofauna; deposit feeders; epistrate feeders; scavengers; Predators; multivariate analyses
Main Subjects
Fisheries
Statistics
Article View: 337
PDF Download: 675
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.