p. 1−20
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4
p. 21−32
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4
p. 33−52
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4
p. 53−66
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4
p. 67−84
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4
p. 85−95
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4
0.05) different clusters based on the phytoplankton community and were strongly correlated with transparency, nitrate and total suspended solids combined. The model that best explained the pattern of distribution of phytoplankton among the stations included depth, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, biological oxygen demand, total dissolved solids and total suspended solids. The findings showed that distribution of phytoplankton is influenced by a complex of environmental parameters especially those related to light and nutrient availability. ]]>
p. 97−110
2536-9814
Vol.21/No.4