p. 1−16
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
T2> T3> T4, although shawarma samples were desirable, their color intensity was intense. In conclusion, the first recipe (T1) without adding fat was the best one, however, more researches on processing and improving the quality of fish shawarma are essential to provide an insight into the consumer’s purchasing patterns.]]>
p. 17−31
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 33−41
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 43−48
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 49−60
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 61−77
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 79−96
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 97−109
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 111−128
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
., and Streptococcus aureus. Antimicrobial activity was measured using ELISA microplate reader. In ethanol extract, Sargassum tenerrimum and Caulerpa peltata exhibited maximum inhibition on the growth of the tested Klebsiella species. The antioxidant potential of various seaweed extracts was determined using the DPPH and FRAP. In the present study, the DPPH activity was consistently higher in the methanolic extracts of Phaeophyta. The maximum percentage of radical-scavenging activity was observed in the Padina tetrastromatica. This study was designed to assay the cytotoxic activity of the extract from brown alga; namely, Sargassum ilicifolium, Sargassum cinereum and Sargassum tenerrimum against breast cancer cells MCF7 by using MTT assay. The research was performed as an in vitro study. The Sargassum cinereum showed the highest IC50 value compared to Sargassum ilicifolium and Sargassum tenerrimum. The seaweed extract can be used as promising anti-oxidative agents, anti-microbial and anti-cancerous in cosmeceutical or nutraceutical products which can upturn the value of an otherwise worthless weed.]]>
p. 129−143
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 145−164
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 165−180
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 181−191
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 193−203
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 205−214
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 215−226
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
0.05). In addition, the length-frequency distributions of M. nipponense in opera house traps, baited with fish and bread, showed no significant difference (P < 0.05). Therefore, there was no difference between bread and fish baits of any size for absorbing the prawn. Results showed that, due to most factors affecting the CPUE of M. nipponense, bread proved to be a better bait selection.]]>
p. 227−234
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
0.05).]]>
p. 235−242
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
3). While, in the case of S. richardsonii, the ‘b’ value was recorded 1.915 with negative allometric growth (b < 3). The regression coefficient (r2) value was noted as 0.95, 0.94, and 0.91 for T. putitora, L. dero, and S. richardsonii, respectively. Moreover, the condition factor of all the three species was near to ‘1’, indicating the suitability of environmental conditions for better growth of these fish species. In addition, a total of 23 morphometric characters and 6 meristic counts were also analyzed, where morphometric characters showed a gradual increase with respect to body length, while the meristic counts remained constant with respect to the increase of body length. Data obtained can give a deep insight into the welfare of fish upon which a proper strategy can be affordable to manage and conserve fish population and their biomass.]]>
p. 243−257
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 269−283
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
0.05). In conclusion, the opera house trap proved its superior efficiency and is therefore recommended to be used for catching the common rudd in the Anzali Lagoon.]]>
p. 259−268
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 285−296
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 297−312
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 313−326
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 327−341
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 343−360
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 361−375
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 377−395
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 397−410
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 411−431
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 433−443
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 445−466
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 467−487
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 489−502
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
Penaeus sp.). In both surveys, the highest catch was caught just after dusk during the daytime, while during the night, it was recorded in the middle of the night. In spring, day and night mean catch rates were not significantly different (P˃0.01) for all species. While in autumn, the rates of Trachurus indicus, Loligo duvauceli, and Penaeus sp. were significantly different (P ˂ 0.01 and T values were 2.80, 3.28 and 2.34, respectively). In addition, those of Saurida undosquamis, Nemipterus japonicus, Sepia sp., and Portunus pelagicus were not significantly different (P˃0.01). The results of the study revealed that both the early morning and the late evening are the best times for fishing.
[m1]]]>
p. 503−512
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 513−527
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6
p. 529−540
2536-9814
Vol.25/No.6